The ICC will discuss the use of technology to review on-field no-ball calls in the wake of the Adam Voges decision in the first Test between the Black Caps and Australia.
Voges was bowled out for seven, but umpire Richard Illingworth wrongly called the Doug Bracewell delivery a no-ball, allowing him to add a further 232 runs in Australia's big innings victory.
Match referee Chris Broad said that Illingworth was 'distraught' with his no-ball call.
"Unfortunately Richard was distraught afterwards when he realised that it wasn’t a no ball," Broad told News Corp.
"I think when anyone is proved wrong in any decision that they make it’s clearly embarrassing at the time."
"But umpires, particularly on the elite panel have a great ability to be able to overcome that feeling and get on with the game.
"The problem is that when an umpire calls a no-ball, you can’t change that decision because under the laws a batsman may change his shot when the no-ball is called. It was called – that’s the end of the matter."
Illingworth won't take the field in the second Test, but will be the third umpire when the Black Caps attempt to level the series in Christchurch, starting on Saturday.
Newshub.