NRL set to take over player punishments

Jack de Belin appears in court last month.
Jack de Belin appears in court last month. Photo credit: AAP

The NRL is edging closer to taking full control of player punishments, with the power to determine the first sanctions for misbehaving players set to be taken away from the clubs.

While teams currently have the first right to first address player behaviour in conjunction with the NRL's integrity unit, that may change as part of a raft of changes ushered in this year.

It's understood the potential change was discussed with club chiefs at the ARL Commission's AGM on Thursday, with mixed reviews from some and support from others.

"That's an open item on our table at the moment," NRL chief executive Todd Greenberg said.

"I don't think we've got consensus amongst the clubs, but I do think we have a majority view that sanctioning should come from the centre and it should be removed from the club's hands.

"That's a discussion I'm keen to have in the first half of this year with some clubs and the leaders of our clubs.

"I have long maintained that clubs should own the culture of their clubs and the sanctioning of their players. What I'm starting to consider, though, is it may be better in the hands of a regulator like us."

The proposal comes after Canberra star Jack Wighton was banned for six games by the Raiders last season, when he pleaded guilty to five counts of assault, only for the NRL to add another four matches to his suspension.

"We need to be mindful that clubs form part of a competition," Greenberg said.

"They compete with each other and they compete to win. We look through a lens, which is the best thing for the game.

"Quite often, they will look through the lens that is best for their club. We're going to be at odds sometimes, so we need to think about that carefully."

Any changes will likely form part of the fallout from a dramatic start to the year, after a shift in policy this week led to Jack de Belin and Dylan Walker being stood down, after pleading not guilty to charges levelled against them.

The NRL stressed these were no-fault decisions, and there was no presumption of the player's guilt or innocence intended or considered.

Meanwhile, the NRL also said it had no plans to pour extra resources into the integrity unit.        

AAP