The Washington Post has run an opinion piece from Syrian Islamist group Ahrar al-Sham criticising US policies, giving an unusual platform to a group that has allied with supporters of al-Qaeda.
The piece, posted online late on Friday and penned by the group's foreign relations head Labib Al Nahhas, excoriates the strategy of US President Barack Obama's administration in Syria, calling it an "abject failure."
In its quest to not support radical groups in Syria, American policy has so narrowly defined the term "moderate" that it excludes most opposition groups in the country, including Ahrar al-Sham, Nahhas said.
Nahhas says Ahrar al-Sham has been "falsely accused" of being close to radical group al-Qaeda and "unfairly vilified" by the Obama administration.
The Islamist group Ahrar al-Sham, one of the most powerful rebel groups in Syria, has allied with al-Qaeda affiliate Al-Nusra in fighting against the Syrian regime and the Islamic State extremist group.
That alliance managed to quickly push regime forces out of key towns in the northwest Idlib province in the last months.
Ahrar al-Sham, Al-Nusra and IS have been targeted in US-led air raids in Syria that were launched in order to destroy the IS group in Iraq and Syria.
The US label "moderate" is an important designation in Syria because it makes a group eligible for training and support from American programs.
US military officials recently reported that 60 fighters were being trained to fight IS, far below the 5400 trainee target for the first year of its program.
The military blamed the small number on difficulties vetting moderate groups willing to take on IS as their primary foe.
Nahhas said the US needs to stop taking such a narrow view of the conflict and start recognising the legitimate mainstream Syrian opposition like Ahrar al-Sham.