Convicted rapist loses Supreme Court legal battle to keep name suppression

WELLINGTON, NEW ZEALAND - JUNE 12: A general view of the coat of arms at the Supreme Court on June 12, 2019 in Wellington, New Zealand. Internet entrepreneur Kim Dotcom is fighting extradition to the United States along with three of his former colleagues - Mathias Ortmann, Bram van der Kolk, and Finn Batat - over the file-sharing website Megaupload. The US Department of Justice has been trying to extradite the men since 2012 on charges of conspiracy, racketeering, and money laundering. An NZ district court permitted the extradition in 2015, leading the defendants to lodge unsuccessful appeals at the High Court and Court of Appeal, prior to this week's Supreme Court appeal. The FBI claims Mr. Dotcom's Megaupload site earned millions of dollars by facilitating illegal file-sharing, however, Dotcom and his co-defendants argue the site simply provided a place for users to store and share large files. Megaupload was once one of the internet’s most popular sites until it was shut down in 2012. (Photo by Hagen Hopkins/Getty Images) (Photo by Hagen Hopkins/Getty Images)
Photo credit: Getty Images

A convicted serial sex offender, who battled in our highest court to keep his name secret, will have his identity revealed in June.

In a Supreme Court judgement released on Tuesday, the court ruled against granting the 21-year-old man permanent name suppression.

However he cannot be named for legal reasons until June 14.

The man was convicted on 10 charges of sexual violence against six female complainants in the Auckland District Court in 2022, after pleading guilty to all charges.

They included multiple counts of rape, unlawful sexual connection, indecent assault and sexual connection with a young person.

The offending happened between 2017 and 2020, when he was aged 14 to 17.

He was sentenced to 12 months home detention.

Since then, the man has fought to keep his identity secret, arguing for permanent name suppression on the basis that publication of his name would be likely to cause him extreme hardship.

His application was declined by the sentencing judge, but the man appealed the decision in multiple courts.

In the judgement released today, the Supreme Court ruled: "While certainly not the only means of providing accountability for a criminal offender... public identification of an offender also takes account of offender culpability."

The six victims were also acknowledged in the decision, with the judgement reading, "the offending has plainly affected their day-to-day lives and their recovery in a number of aspects" and "ongoing name suppression for the offender means their recovery is incomplete".

Three of the women, Mia Edmonds, Rosie Veldkamp, and Ellie Oram, have previously had their automatic name suppression waived, so they could speak publicly about the impact the man's offending has had on their lives.

Today Edmonds described the Supreme Court judgement as a massive victory.

"Forcing sexual offenders to take accountability for their actions is essential," she said.

"This man's legal fights have consumed the past three years of my life.

"This is our first real win, and it feels strange, but it is also incredibly empowering."

Veldkamp said she was relieved at the decision.

"My pain and anxiety will not ease until this decision is properly seen through, and for all women to know who he is and what he has done," Veldkamp said.

Oram said: "To know finally after fighting this battle that his name is going to be out and placed on top of his horrible offences is an indescribable feeling."

Oram also had a message for her fellow survivors.

"We have really gone through it for far too long but you all have been so empowering and carried yourselves with such grace on this dark journey."

Name suppression for the man will lapse on June 14.